AssetCentral.ai

Outright vs Mortgaged Ownership Comparator

Same property, two financing structures. Compare IRR, year-1 cashflow, and exit proceeds — to see whether leverage is helping you or just amplifying your bet.

Not financial advice. This calculator is for informational use. Outputs depend entirely on the assumptions you enter. It is not financial, tax, legal, mortgage, or investment advice. Consult a qualified, licensed adviser in your jurisdiction before any property, financing, or tax decision.
Property assumptions
Scenario A
IRR (levered)
7.3%
Deposit
€500,000
Loan
€0
Monthly pmt
€0
Cash-on-cash (yr1)
4.5%
Yr-1 cashflow
€22,400
Exit value
€671,958
Scenario B
IRR (levered)
10.8%
Deposit
€175,000
Loan
€325,000
Monthly pmt
€1,752
Cash-on-cash (yr1)
0.8%
Yr-1 cashflow
€1,381
Exit value
€671,958
Which one wins?
Cash invested · A − B
€325,000
IRR · B − A
3.5%
Year-1 cashflow · B − A
−€21,019

Leverage amplifies returns when capital growth is positive and the property pays its mortgage. It also amplifies losses if either fails. Compare IRR but also year-1 cashflow — a strong IRR that depends on the exit is a different bet than one that pays you every year.

AssetCentral viewLeverage at 65% wins
IRR delta (65% − 0%)
3.5%

Buying with a 65% mortgage delivers 3.5% more IRR than 0%. You tie up €175,000 instead of €500,000 — the freed equity can buy more property.

Red flag · Mortgage rate locked at 4.2%. If rates step up before refinance, the leverage case erodes fast.

Next move · Stress the capital-growth assumption to 0%. If 65% LTV still wins on income alone, the leverage case is robust.

Save this scenario — freeTry full analysis free for 7 days

Free saves the scenario. Trial unlocks the full report.

Free stress test

IRR at 65% LTV under stress

Three what-ifs. Individual unlocks the full sensitivity grid.

What ifBaseUnder stress
Capital growth −2%/yr10.8%7.6%
Mortgage rate +200bps10.8%8.7%
Rent growth −1%/yr10.8%10.5%

Leverage amplifies both wins and losses — the same property at a different LTV reacts very differently to these shocks. Individual models the full grid.

Save this result via email

We’ll send your ownership comparator inputs + outputs to your inbox, and add you to the monthly newsletter for serious property investors.

We’ll only use your email for the result + newsletter. See our privacy policy.

How to interpret your results

  • Scenario A defaults to outright (0% LTV). Scenario B defaults to 65% LTV. Move either to model the structure you're considering.
  • Higher LTV usually produces higher IRR — but only if capital growth is positive and the property covers its mortgage. If either fails, leverage works against you.
  • Compare year-1 cashflow as well as IRR. An IRR built on exit gain is more fragile than one paid in annual rent.
  • Same operating costs and rent growth apply to both scenarios — the difference is purely the financing.

What this doesn’t include

Stamp duty, transaction fees, mortgage arrangement fees, and any prepayment penalties on early repayment. These vary too much to model generically. For tax-aware after-tax IRR by jurisdiction, see AssetCentral's portfolio workspace.

Next steps

Keep going on this property, or move it into the full portfolio so you can track it month after month.

Import into portfolio uses the free Individual trial — no card to start. Upgrade to Pro adds the full AI team and portfolio dashboard.